日清戦争 ・南京事件・従軍慰安婦・日韓併合・満州事変・日中戦争・東京裁判・GHQ・大東亜戦争(太平洋戦争)・歴史研究関係の書籍を翻訳

SDHF Newsletter No.55 Guantanamo & Comfort Women

Guantanamo &Comfort Women 谷山雄二朗
慰安婦問題の真実を再度訴える

谷山雄二朗さんがまたまた慰安婦問題の虚構をYouTube で訴えました。説得力のある谷山さんのスピーチを是非ご覧ください。http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijYLNvUPU_A

今回は、慰安婦として名乗り出てきた最初、そして二番目の女性、金学順、文玉珠のことを取り上げて、どちらも「一言も」慰安婦に強制されたなどと言っていないということを強調しています。文玉珠に至っては２年足らずで２６１４５円も貯金していた台帳が見つかったのですから、こんな稼ぎをする「性奴隷」とは一体何なのかということです。

これを海外に拡散するために、英文版Newsletter で下記の通り、４０００ほどのアドレスに発信しました。　　　　平成２５年２月１日　「史実を世界に発信する会」　茂木弘道

Guantanamo & Comfort Women

Mr. Taniyama, TV producer, journalist, writer & film maker, who was selected as a
finalist for 2009 in the “Democracy Video Challenge” contest, hosted by U.S. State Department, speaks out on the “Comfort Women” issue again on YouTube.

This time he stresses two important pieces of evidence: Ms. Kim Hak-sun, the first so-called comfort woman who came onto the scene and Ms. Mun Ok-ju, the second to come onto the scene. Ms. Kim confessed at a press conference in Seoul on August 14, 1991 that when she was 14 she was sold to a Korean sex parlor by her mother for 40 Yen. Ms. Mun came to Japan in March 1992 to demand that the Japanese government give her the contents of her bank account which had not been closed. The bank account record was found and the balance of her account was 26,000 Yen. She said she worked at a brothel attached to the Japanese military from 1942 to 1944. Thus, she earned over a period of two years more than 26,000 Yen, with which, at that time, she could have bought 5 houses back in Korea.

Both of them mentioned the one word “coercion”. They were just prostitute, as an official U. S. document (United States Office of War Information, Psychological Warfare Team Attached to U.S. Army Forces India-Burma Theater APO 689) records in the preface: “A ‘comfort girl’ is nothing more than a prostitute or ‘professional camp follower’ attached to the Japanese Army for the benefit of the soldiers.”

Here is Mr. Taniyama’s speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijYLNvUPU_A

We have previously discussed the “Comfort Women” issue in depth at our Web site;
*The Truth about The Comfort Women: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/84_S4.pdf
*No Forced or Organized Recruitment: Misconceptions about Comfort Women and the
Japanese Military: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/31_S4.pdf
*Behind the Comfort Women Controversy: How the Lies Became Truth
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/39_S4.pdf

I wonder why the Western media have yet to report such historical facts and when they　will finally begin to disclose the truth.

Sincerely,

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Secretary General
for KASE Hideaki, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

『ここまで違う　中国と日本』（加瀬英明・石平）
（『相手が悪いと思う中国人、相手に悪いと思う日本人』（ＷＡＣ)）

日本文明の特殊性については欧米の学者もかなり認識していたが、中国文明から完全に独立した七大文明の一つと明快に位置付けたのは、ハンチントンであった。（『文明の衝突』）日本文明は「一つの国で一つの文明をなしている」世界に類例のないケースなのである。
確かに日本は古来中国文明から大きな影響を受けてきた。そして中国の古典文明、中華文明にあこがれ、「同文同種」といった中国と日本との一体感を感じている日本人も多い。しかし、そうした側面はあるものの実は、日本と中国とはその文化、民族性において全く異なっている、というのが実態なのである。
「ここまで違うのか」というほど異なっていることを、百冊を超える著書がある外交評論家の加瀬英明氏と、鋭い中国論を次々に出している石平氏が、談論風発の議論で解き明かしたのがこの書である。
http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E7%9B%B8%E6%89%8B%E3%81%8C%E6%82%AA%E3%81%84%E3%81%A8%E6%80%9D%E3%81%86%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BA%BA-%E7%9B%B8%E6%89%8B%E3%81%AB%E6%82%AA%E3%81%84%E3%81%A8%E6%80%9D%E3%81%86%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BA%BA-WAC-BUNKO-%E5%8A%A0%E7%80%AC/dp/4898316743/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1357955571&sr=1-2-fkmr0

日本人必読の書であるが、日本文明の真髄、そして中国文明といかに違うかということを世界の人々に理解してもらうために、この本は極めて役に立つのではないかと考え、全編英訳し、発信する会のサイトにアップロードして全世界に発信するものである。同時に下記のように、Email Newsletter で海外のマスコミ、学者等４０００の宛先に発信した。
　　　　　平成２５年１月１１日　　「史実を世界に発信する会」　茂木弘道

Japan and China: How Different They Are!
by KASE Hideaki and Seki Hei (Shi Ping)

Mr. Kase Hideaki, Japanese diplomatic critic and Seki Hei (Shi Ping), China born writer have extensive and insightful discussions about the nature of Japanese and Chinese culture in this book.
A prevailing notion by Sinologists, both in the West and Japan, is that as the wealth of the Chinese “middle class” rises, they will want more democracy and political freedom—they will want to be like the middle class found elsewhere. However, this notion is far from correct is sustained by the flawed belief that Japan and China are historically and culturally the same: the Japanese and Chinese think in the same manner, therefore, if Japan can be democratic, then democracy in China is inevitable.
In fact, as Mr. Kase and Mr. Sekihei point out with numerous examples, not only are Japanese and Chinese cultures distinct from one another, Chinese cultural elements assimilated by Japan were significantly altered to fit into a Japanese social context.
The changes are indeed marked in the authors extensive and insightful narration of Chinese history. It will be evident to the reader that historic Japan and China—and modern Japanese and Chinese—share almost no commonalities aside from perhaps a sharing of basic forms of kanji.

*Summary: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/96_S2.pdf
*Full text: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/96_S4.pdf
*Author profile: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/96_S3.pdf

Questions are welcome.

Sincerely,

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Secretary General
for KASE Hideaki, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact