‘ニュースレター’ カテゴリーのアーカイブ

SDHF Newsletter No.362J アイヌ問題を放置していると北海道は第二のウクライナになる

2022年8月3日 水曜日




・自由権規約委員会への意見書:  https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared%20Documents/JPN/INT_CCPR_CSS_JPN_49219_E.pdf








令和4年8月3日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木弘道

Leaving the Ainu Issue Unaddressed Will Make Another Ukraine
Sawada Kenichi,

Japan Society for Ainu Studies

Mr. Sawada Kenichi sent the above-mentioned statement to the CCPR-International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, whose 136 Session is scheduled 10 October 2022 – 04 November 2022. His statement is uploaded on the official site as stated bellow:

Mr. Sawada’s statement: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared%20Documents/JPN/INT_CCPR_CSS_JPN_49219_E.pdf

As mentioned in his statement, the Russian Federation is beginning to express its

territorial ambitions toward Hokkaido through the Ainu issue. A written request that Russia should establish an Ainu autonomous province to place part of Hokkaido under its control has been submitted to President Putin from within Japan. Claims such as “Ainu are of the Russian origin” and “Russia has all rights to Hokkaido” are completely wrong. These claims made in Japan and overseas that encourage the division of Hokkaido are caused by the obscure document of the Japanese government that recognized the Ainu. Leaving such a situation unaddressed is very dangerous. We should not give Russia a pretext for invading Hokkaido.

However, recent scientific DNA research shows that the Ainu are undoubtedly descendants of the Jomon Japanese people. On May 13, 2019, Japan’s leading research institutions, including the National Museum of Nature and Science, National Institution of Genetics and the University of Tokyo, announced the joint research result that the Ainu inherit 70% of the DNA of the Jomon people. The Ainu continuously inhabited Hokkaido at least since the Jomon period (more than 10,000 years ago).

Furthermore, the “Research content” of the article “Ancient Jomon genome sequence analysis sheds light on migration patterns of early East Asian populations” by the University of Tokyo, the University of Tokyo Graduate School and Kanazawa University, released on August 25, 2020, says that ‘IK002 (note: bone of a Jomon individual excavated from the Ikawazu shell-mound site in Aichi Prefecture), a mainland Jomon individual, was found to cluster with the Ainu.’ This result coincides with the whole-genome sequencing of the Hokkaido Jomon people, which indicates that the Ainu people are the oldest lineage of inhabitants of the Japanese archipelago, and, at the same time, they are likely to be one of the direct descendants of the founding population of East Eurasians.

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.361J 大東亜戦争への道 その2 序章 歴史問題

2022年7月27日 水曜日

中村 粲

その2 序章 歴史問題





・ 〃 英訳文: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Road2E.pdf
・著者プロフィール: http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/Naka.pdf

「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木弘道
協力者代表:神奈川大学教授 小山和伸


Nakamura Akira, Professor Emeritus of Dokkyo University
(English Translation: Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact)

Part 2: Introduction

The author says that historical controversies are the most nagging problems confronting Japan during the postwar era. Because Just as an ex-convict, forever branded, must live out his days as a pariah, Japan has seen its history reviled. Encumbered with the aggressor stigma, our country has yet to resume its rightful status in the international community.

Especially, Chinese maintains the notion of Japan as the malefactor and China as its victim. Based on this notion Chinese employ arrogant, intrusive language to describe Japanese textbooks or pilgrimages to Yasukuni Shrine. Unfortunately, Japanese government has acquiesced to the Chinese demand.

By performing a structural analysis of Greater East Asian War, and retracting its process, the author came to discover two main themes, i.e., negotiation between Japan and US in connection with the Open Door Policy, and the battle against communism. That discovery enabled him to position the Greater East Asian War at the climactic point where those two themes met and expanded.

Since author’s position to emphasize the historical back ground of the war he begins with relationship between Meiji Japan and China Korea, both of which were on the verge of modernization. So, Chapter 1 is titled Beginnings of Modern Japan-Korea Relations.”

URL:  https://www.sdh-fact.com/book-article/1952/
PDF:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Road2E.pdf
Author Profile:  https://www.sdh-fact.com/auther/nakamura-akira/

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.360J 大東亜戦争への道 その1 緒言・目次

2022年7月19日 火曜日

中村 粲

その1 緒言・目次






・  〃 英訳文:http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Road1E.pdf
・ 著者プロフィール:http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/Naka.pdf


「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木弘道

協力者代表:神奈川大学教授 小山和伸


Nakamura Akira, Dokkyo University Professor Emeritus

(English translation: Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact)

Part 1: Preface and Table of Contents

The Greater East Asian War has prompted the publication of a great many works seeking to analyze the conflict. Among them, The Road to the Greater East Asian War, which devotes 660 pages to the topic, has won high praise for its author’s exhaustive research.

The analysis begins in the modern era, and explores the events that led up to the Greater East Asian War. It includes the background behind actions taken by Japan and the reasons for Japan’s choices.

As the Preface states, most wars are caused by a variety of complex factors, among them historical events. According to what is referred to as the IMTFE (International Military Tribune for the Far East) historical perception, Japan and only Japan bears the responsibility for the outbreak of the Greater East Asian War. That perception, which prevails in historical circles abroad, and even in Japan, is now embraced as an unassailable truth. The Road to the Greater East Asia War confronts that viewpoint head-on with the results of masterful research supported by fact.

It is our hope that the young people of Japan will read this book for a fresh look at an important phase in our nation’s history. We would also encourage scholars, politicians, journalists, and students in the world at large to become acquainted with this valuable resource; to that end, we have decided to prepare an English translation.

As a perusal of the Table of Contents will reveal, Chapter 1 deals with the beginnings of Japan-Korea relations in the modern era, and Chapter 20 with Japan’s strenuous but unsuccessful efforts to achieve peace. If we count the Introduction and Epilogue, there are 22 chapters in all. We hope you will read each installment when it appears. Your questions are always welcome.

URL: https://www.sdh-fact.com/book-article/1949/
PDF:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Road1E.pdf
Author Profile: https://www.sdh-fact.com/auther/nakamura-akira/

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.359J77記念日=中国共産党が日本に戦争を仕掛けた記念日

2022年7月11日 月曜日

「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木 弘道







令和4年7月11日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木弘道



MOTEKI Hiromichi

Chairman, Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

On July 7, 1937, the Marco Polo Bridge Incident arose. Even today we hear claims that the incident was orchestrated by the Japanese military, or that it was an accident. However, the truth is that it was the successful outcome of a CCP (Chinese Communist Party) conspiracy.

The incident was the direct cause of war between Japan and China, which expanded further into a full-scale conflict. Therefore, the Marco Polo Bridge Incident is of considerable significance not only to the CCP and China, but also to Japan and the rest of the world.

This essay proves that the incident was initiated by the CCP. Even after the 29th Route Army and the China Garrison Army signed a local ceasefire agreement, the CCP violated that agreement and a great war ensued.

Questions are welcome.

URL:  https://www.sdh-fact.com/essay-article/1939/
PDF:  https://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Incident77E.pdf

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.358J 一般社団法人歴史論戦研究所長挨拶

2022年6月14日 火曜日



会長挨拶: http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/iRICH.pdf
英訳文:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/iRICHE.pdf






令和4年6月14日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木弘道

Statement by Sugihara Seishiro,

President, International Research Institute for Controversial Histories (iRICH)

The International Research Institute for Controversial Histories (iRICH) became a general incorporated association with the official appellation of “General Incorporated Association International Research Institute for Controversial Histories,” as of April 1, 2022. Taking this opportunity, Mr. Sugihara issued the following statement:

Statement: URL: http://www.sdh-fact.com/opinion-article/1935/
PDF: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/iRICHE.pdf

He emphasizes that presently, historical studies in the world tend to deviate from the scientific methodology and have become something very different. A typical example is the “comfort women issue.”

The “comfort women problem,” first started by Yoshida Sejji’s book published in 1983, which depicted comfort women “hunting” in Cheju Island. The Asahi Newspaper sensationally and repeatedly published the content of the book, in more than 18 instalments Then, story of “the comfort women” crime, the alleged abduction of Korean women and their sex slave-like treatment, spread all over the world. However, the story was proven to be a total fiction. Yoshida admitted it and in 2014, the Asahi Newspaper deleted all of the 18 articles based on Yoshida’s book.

In 2020, Professor Ramseyer of Harvard University posted a scholarly essay, “Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War,” on the International Review of Law and Economics’ website, in which he clearly stated that comfort women were engaged in sexual services under contract, definitively proving that there was no “forced abduction.” Then, many critics from South Korea, the United States, Europe and Japan, calling themselves scholars, issued a statement asking Professor Ramseyer to withdraw his essay. The number of scholars who joined in the statement demanding the removal of Professor Ramseyer’s essay amounted to 3,665 as of May 11, 2021.

This is an act digressing far from the standards of the scientific study and can no longer be called a study. Those self-proclaimed scholars simply asked for withdrawal of the essay, and did not refer to any facts, neither did they try to refute his arguments. This was not a study concerned with facts. It was not a study by any standards.

Mr. Sugihara closed his statement with the following words:

“We, the researchers of the International Research Institute for Controversial Histories, will look far and wide across the world, make further efforts to continue our study as science, based on facts, and contribute to the promotion of world peace and development of the world for the international citizens.”

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.357J 日本人に対するヘイトスピーチ解消法の制定を

2022年6月14日 火曜日






同英訳文(自由権規約委員会公式サイトに掲載されたもの)  https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared%20Documents/JPN/INT_CCPR_CSS_JPN_48627_E.pdf

令和4年6月14日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 会長 茂木弘道

Request for Enactment of a Law to Prevent Hate Speech
“against Japanese people”

Proposal to International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

In 2016, “Act on the Promotion of Efforts to Eliminate Unfair Discriminatory Speech and Behavior against Persons Originating from Outside Japan” was enacted in Japan. The act aims to eliminate hate crimes, but it has a serious flaw because it restricts the target for protection only to “persons originating from outside Japan.”

Therefore The Japan Society for History Text Book and International Research Institute of Controversial Histories jointly submitted a proposal to CCPR-International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 136 Sessions scheduled 10 Oct – o4 Nov 2022 requesting CCPR to recommend Japanese government to enact a corrective law to prevent hate speech against Japanese people.

Submission to CCPR: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared%20Documents/JPN/INT_CCPR_CSS_JPN_48627_E.pdf

PDF: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/CCPR136e.pdf

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.356J 書評 ブラックアウト アメリカ黒人による”民主党の新たな奴隷農場”からの独立宣言

2022年6月6日 月曜日

< 書 評 >
How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democratic Plantation
Candace Owens, Simon & Schuster, 2020.


日本語訳(「史実を世界に発信する会」 )





書評英語原文:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/blackoutE.pdf
書評日本語訳: http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/blackout.pdf

令和4年6月6日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 茂木弘道


How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democratic Plantation
Candace Owens
Simon & Schuster, 2020.
Review by Tadashi Hama

American political commentator Candace Owens elaborates in her first book her thoughts on what is wrong with black America. Owens had a very large audience before publication of this book—several hundred thousand YouTube subscribers and several million Twitter followers. It is difficult to tell how many of these really agree with her, but at the very least, if anyone has seen her speak, she is a force of nature.

Owens identifies as a conservative—a black American conservative. Those who feed exclusively on mainstream media will regurgitate the media narrative, in that conservatives are white capitalist, gun-loving Christians. Furthermore, according to conventional wisdom, American conservatives are anti-immigration and nationalist; the very definition of a “bigot” and “fascist”. People deeply seeped in the dominant media narrative, unceasingly nag America of how horrible conservatives are and how these “bigots” and “fascist” are an imminent threat to American democracy, that is, the Leftist vision of “American democracy”. A black American identifying as a conservative, however, invites not only hate but derision—surely this black person is slightly mentally unbalanced!

While embracing true liberalism, Owens also rejects “the victim narrative,” in that one’s life is entirely based on the whims of some vague externality that appears every single time. For example, the Left claims that today’s black Americans are a “permanent underclass” due to “institutional racism” and “oppression”. The Left further claims that today’s blacks are still feeling “the lingering effects” of black slavery, which ended 160 years ago. A corollary to this is that today’s whites are responsible for pain and suffering caused by their slave-owning ancestors, from over 160 years ago, and are therefore liable for reparations. Owens believes that the only way blacks can advance themselves, is for them to assume responsibility over their own lives, and to reject “the victim narrative”.

URL: http://www.sdh-fact.com/review-article/1929/
PDF: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/blackoutE.pdf

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.354J 書評 英文版「大東亜戦争 日本は勝利の方程式を持っていた」

2022年5月9日 月曜日

< 書 評 >
Japan’s Master Plan for Victory: What Could Have Been.
Moteki Hiromichi

日本語訳(「史実を世界に発信する会」 )







書評英語原文:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Miroslave.pdf

書評日本語訳: http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/Miroslav.pdf

令和4年5月9日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 茂木弘道


Japan’s Master Plan for Victory: What Could Have Been.
Moteki Hiromichi

Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact, 2020

Originally published as Daitoa senso: Nihon wa shori no hoteishiki wo motteita (Heart Publishers, 2018).

Reviewed by: Miroslav Marinov, Ph.D.

Mr. Marinov states that Mr. Moteki’s new book challenges the reader’s understanding of the Pacific War: “What if I told you that there was a realistic way for Japan to win the war?”

The readers’ first reaction could be that this is another “revisionist” treatise or that it is one of those popular “what if” books of alternative history.

He says that Mr. Moteki’s book is based on meticulous research of history and therefore it is not reasonable to categorize it as a “what if” type book. He also says that Mr. Moteki’s approach makes it very difficult to place the book in the category of historical “revisionism.” Mr. Moteki’s balanced presentation of the facts challenges the edifice of censorship and opens the window to a realistic interpretation of the Pacific War.

The central focus of Mr. Moteki’s book is the “Draft Proposal for Hastening the End of War against the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Chiang Kai-shek (Approved at the Liaison Conference between Imperial General Headquarters and the Imperial Government, held on November 15, 1941).” The Draft Proposal was realistic because it called for concentration of Japan’s forces near the area of South-East Asia and the Indian Ocean. Japan’s goal was to secure its resources, not to conquer the world. Taking full control over the British supply lines in the Indian Ocean was the next target, which alarmed Churchill who wrote to Roosevelt in April 1942 that the possible Japanese incursion into India and dominance over Indian Ocean routes would bring collapse to the British position in the Middle East and loss of control over the oil supplies.

Mr. Marinov concludes as follows:

The main value of Moteki’s book is the sober and objective analysis of the realities of the Pacific War. It shows Japan within the context of the international relations at the time and helps to understand its reactions to confrontations from which the Western countries are absolved and Japan is blamed for all negative consequences. In that sense, the book dispels the myth of the “foolish Japs” who dared to go against the power of the USA. Unfortunately, this cartoonish myth, rooted in Western racial prejudice, which is much older than the conflicts of the 1930s, still persists. Hopefully, such books will gradually change the public perception from a knee-jerk emotional reaction to objectivity.

URL: http://www.sdh-fact.com/review-article/1916/
PDF: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Miroslave.pdf

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.353J 鯨は国を助く(全)

2022年5月6日 金曜日

小泉 武夫 著










英訳文: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Countinge.pdf

令和4年5月6日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 茂木弘道

Counting the Blessing of Whales:
Insights from a Chopstics-wielding Patriot
Koizumi Takeo
(Complete version)

IWC (International Whaling Commission) was organized in 1948 for the purpose of conserving whale resources. However, under the trend of natural animal preserving movement, US and some other members dominated the IWC with strong assertion of anti-whaling and decided to adopt 10 years of moratorium of commercial whaling in 1982.

The resolution has a reservation that the moratorium should be reconsidered by 1992

based on the scientific result of research whaling. However, even though scientific data obtained by the research whaling proved that number of whales was much more than previously estimated, rather much increased, the anti-whaling members were stubborn to maintain their insistence of anti-whaling.

Against the purpose of the IWC, they began to assert that “whaling itself should be banned”. No scientific discussion could be permitted at the IWC meeting. Japan finally made a decision to withdraw from the IWC. From July 2018, Japan resumed commercial whaling.

The anti-whaling advocators say that the whale is high intelligent or it is sad to kill whales. Their thought is not based on scientific evidence, rather based on their arbitrary or self-centered conviction. The truth is that they think only they are high class minded, as against savage minded Japanese. This is self-centered typical racism.

Japan has a long tradition of whaling cultured back to Jomon period of nearly 10,000 years. Japan has developed a unique whaling culture. We utilized all part of whales in various purposes. This is extremely ecological use of whales.

The Japanese always treated whales with respect and spared no effort to show reverence. Japanese have been grateful for the blessings of whales and deeply love and respect them. Evidence of this is that there are memorial mounds and graves of whales in temples near whaling stations where whaling thrived. What is even more surprising is that many temples nationwide give a posthumous name to each of the whales caught and hold memorial services for them.

This book written by Koizumi Takeo, professor emeritus of Tokyo University of Agriculture introduces Japanese whale culture extensively. I believe many people in western countries will appreciate its high quality content of this book. Moreover he urges that whales will play an important role for the preservation of the globe environment in future. We are planning to publish this translation via Amazon in kindle and on/demand/publishing in near future.

URL:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/book-article/1913/
PDF:  http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/Countinge.pdf
Profile: http://www.sdh-fact.com/auther/koizumi-takeo/

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

SDHF Newsletter No.349J 中国ガンとの最終戦争その6 第5章 選択を迫られる日本

2022年4月5日 火曜日


その6—第5章 選択を迫られる日本


第1節 戦後日本人の独立心の欠如


第2節 期待されている日本の役割


第3節 日本と台湾=兄弟国の再認識


第4節 間違わなければアジアの世紀はそこにある


第5章 英訳文: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/CancerE6.pdf

令和4年4月5日 「史実を世界に発信する会」 茂木弘道

(Bensei Publishing Inc.)

Lin Kenryo

(English Translation: Society for the Dissemination of Historical Facts)

Series No. 6: Chapter 5: Japan at a Crossroads

Dr. Lin says that the US and Japan should fight China cancer together. Japan’s most important role in this fight is to help China democratize.

The worst evil in today’s China is its one-party dictatorship. On a whim, a dictator can rob citizens of their lives and appropriate their assets. In the eyes of the Chinese — of the entire world, for that matter — a monolithic dictatorship is a nightmare. The great majority of Chinese want to leave China and move to a democratic nation. The Chinese long for democracy, and many of them are making a real effort to democratize China.

In the past Japan supported Chinese revolutionaries, helping them to overthrow the Qing dynasty. But today’s Japan does not need to send money or weapons to China as it did in support of the Xinhai Revolution in 1911. Instead, the Japanese need to encourage the democratization of China. Pacifist Japan’s support for democratization would have a considerable impact, and would help motivate the Chinese.

Since the concepts of human rights and democracy are understood throughout the world, and since they transcend generational and ideological boundaries, there will be widespread approval of Japan’s stance and support for democratization. Such a movement would certainly become known to the Chinese people and begin to broaden. The members of the Chinese democratization movement and outside sympathizers could collaborate, and their activities would surely expand. Such an eventuality is the CCP’s biggest fear.

In other words, the democratization of China is the most effective means of mitigating China cancer.

HTML: http://www.sdh-fact.com/book-article/1899/
PDF: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL/CancerE6.pdf

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

ページ 4 of 39« 先頭...23456...102030...最後 »